andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2021-02-12 03:08 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I think article four confirms my view that most voters are not going to be voting based on the GRA even if the May elections were going to be an ordinary general election.

Date: 2021-02-12 05:42 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
Finally found the subhead which reveals what GRA stands for. But I was already guessing the G was for Gender from its proximity in the article to otherwise untethered discussion of trans rights.

Date: 2021-02-15 09:56 am (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I doubt very much if it will make *any* difference to the vote whatsoever.

I mean even you wouldn't vote Tory if they had a better record on trans-rights.

Date: 2021-02-15 11:07 am (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I thiink you misunderstand me. If the Tories were the best party on trans-rights but the other parties retained their current mix of positions, I don't think you would vote Tory.

Date: 2021-02-16 10:21 am (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I think there is a subtle difference between

1) we have won this election which we consider to be the electorate instructing us to begining negotiations on indepedence

and
2) we have won this election, we are now independent.

It may be that it is a distinction without a difference.

Date: 2021-02-16 10:39 am (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam

That's probably fair comment.

It has the advantage internally to the independence movement of demonstrating that the current leadership are trying and externally of demonstrating serious and consistent majority support and probably establishes as a fact that the will of the Scottish people for self-determination is being thwarted by the English government.

Not sure that it gets you much further than that.

I personally would be uncomfortable about formally reading too much in to using the May '21 elections as a proxy plebiscite. I think it would be fair for the Unionist community to say that nobody asked them if the May '21 election was going to be a proxy for indyref 2 and they were voting about schools and Police Scotland etc and the reckoned quite a few SNP voters were too.

Date: 2021-02-16 12:54 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I think it's more fundamental than that. I think people have an expectation that General Elections will be about things generally.

Using a general election as a plebescite on a single issue should come at the backend of a process of trying to resolve that controvosy through other, more suitable methods, rather than as a short-circuit to it.

As it is, no voter in Scotland can be in any doubt that the SNP winning the election in May is going to lead to a referendum but they still might have other considerations they want to vote on.

Have some fun, ridiculous chess variants

Date: 2021-02-22 07:44 pm (UTC)
jducoeur: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jducoeur

Howl's Moving Castle: less ridiculous than you might think. There's a medieval chess variant (Tamurlane's Chess) that includes a "prince" -- if the King is checkmated, it can swap places with the Prince. And the King's Pawn can promote to another Prince. And the Prince's Pawn can promote to a King's Pawn. So yes, you can sometimes have to checkmate four times.

For truly insane, an SCA friend has just made me a set of Meta-Chess, which is a big chess set that carries a small chess set on top, so you're playing the game at multiple levels at once...

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 17th, 2025 10:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »