andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2021-09-08 01:42 pm (UTC)
chess: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chess
Yes - you're missing that National Insurance is capped, which means your top earners will not be paying their fair share of this. (Unless it bypasses the cap as well as the 'not if you're a pensioner' bit, which is unclear from the article.)

Also missing:

This is headlined as 'social care' but is actually going to make up the NHS shortfall during the life of this parliament - it seems unlikely they'll drop a huge NHS cut just before an election, and thus unlikely that it will actually go to social care.

This goes with a 'care cap' which benefits only people with assets - this is the whole 'granny shouldn't have to sell the house for care' thing which only benefits people whose granny owned a house in the first place.
Edited Date: 2021-09-08 01:44 pm (UTC)

Date: 2021-09-08 02:00 pm (UTC)
chess: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chess
As pointed out lower down in that thread, going up to 80k only just gets you over the cap so it's not clear from the graph that this is an issue: see eg https://twitter.com/juliman66/status/1435361963224309764 and https://twitter.com/RobShaer/status/1435264090017050627
Edited Date: 2021-09-08 02:00 pm (UTC)

Date: 2021-09-08 04:05 pm (UTC)
wildeabandon: picture of me (Default)
From: [personal profile] wildeabandon
Also NI starts at a lower income than income tax, so low earners will be paying more than they would if we just increased income tax.

(Also NI is fundamentally stupid, and should just be scrapped and replaced by adjusting the income tax rates and bands in a sensible way)

Date: 2021-09-08 04:51 pm (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
NI also doesn't catch income from dividends, renting, and other such things that the better-off are more likely to have as income too, AIUI.

Date: 2021-09-08 04:39 pm (UTC)
purplerabbits: (Default)
From: [personal profile] purplerabbits
The matrix trailer is great but 05:36 is absolutely not pm :-) (unless that's the point)

Date: 2021-09-09 11:28 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anna_wing
I found the kitchen post a bit confusing, because I didn't realise it was just a blog post until I was halfway through and thinking, "was the editor drunk?"

Really, an efficiently designed kitchen is a kitchen that is easy to cook in, and is a good kitchen to have if you can, regardless of whether nasty people liked them too. "Sleek surfaces" are not more morally questionable than non-sleek ones and are mostly easier to clean and maintain (I like stainless steel myself). A well-fitted kitchen will in fact have space for the chopping boards (one each for meat, bread, and everything else), the cleaning materials, and a rail near the sink to hang the tea-towel. I find cosmetic wall panels a bit twee, and I really like freezers, but tastes differ.

I do regret not building in a corner pull-out section, those are both cool and a much better use of space. Maybe in future.

Date: 2021-09-10 03:14 am (UTC)
adrian_turtle: (Default)
From: [personal profile] adrian_turtle
Yeah, I think the editor must have been drunk. It looks like there are 3 essays in there: one about 20th century kitchen architecture (related to efficient use of space, the same kind of engineering that brought us time-and-motion studies of assembly lines.) Also related to being ABLE to design a kitchen, instead of squeezing plumbing into an old building, and caring about the comfort of the user. You're right that many of the design details they came up with are really useful, though some of them have become so familiar you don't notice them unless they're missing. (Like a refrigerator where the door opens the wrong way.)

The essay about how many times "labor-saving devices" changed expectations so the overall amount of labor didn't go down that much is really disconnected. Sure, they're both about the history of kitchen work. I see how they COULD be connected. Are there kinds of labor-saving design that don't have this effect?

And the essay about kitchens that are for display, not for cooking, is something else again. I think that would be an interesting thing to write about, but she barely touched on it. Lots of people do very little cooking. If you ask them, they'd tell you of COURSE they don't have underpaid servants preparing their meals. Their meal prep is outsourced to commercial kitchens, whether they get takeout or buy semi-prepared food from groceries.

And another essay

Date: 2021-09-10 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anna_wing
Exactly!

Are there kinds of labor-saving design that don't have this effect?

I can think of washing-machines (I am old enough to remember my grandmother's housekeeper washing clothes with a washboard), slow-cookers, and most recently, micro-fibre cloths and swiffers.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 05:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »