Date: 2022-03-28 01:51 pm (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
1. Still working on my sense of scale.

2. Keeping those lives at risk is the whole point of not changing the rules or of changing them in bad ways, isn't it.

3. Well, that's terrifying in several flavours of fascism.

5. Truth is being targeted for willful drowning, with malice aforethought. We can see that clearly.

7. I'm not sure, but I worry that a Russian collapse, if it happens without any kind of moderating influences, will lead to an even worse premature-death toll.

8. No, because Canadian armed forces are being targeted for the same kind of subversion.

Date: 2022-03-28 02:10 pm (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
That's going to be an interesting process to try to manage. Interesting in several flavours of scary-chaotic.

Date: 2022-03-28 05:24 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss
I was reading too fast and managed to parse Lia Thomas as Liz Truss, which was interesting.

Date: 2022-03-28 05:34 pm (UTC)
ng_moonmoth: The Moon-Moth (Default)
From: [personal profile] ng_moonmoth
9. Any info on the carbon footprint per square meter of fabricating solar panels? That and transportation/disposal carbon should properly be weighed into the tradeoffs against energy production (which depends on local conditions) for installing solar.
Edited (typo) Date: 2022-03-28 05:36 pm (UTC)

Date: 2022-03-29 05:37 pm (UTC)
ng_moonmoth: The Moon-Moth (Default)
From: [personal profile] ng_moonmoth
Very informative. Thanks!

Date: 2022-03-29 12:03 am (UTC)
arrctic: contemplative (Default)
From: [personal profile] arrctic
1. nice imagery and comparisons there
3. absolute bs. bs during normal times but especially so during wartime.
6. this was lovely to read.
7. somewhat related: a fellow grad student of mine who happens to be Russian was complaining on FB about sanctions on Russian scientists the other day, saying the sanctions would do more harm than good. I can see where she is coming from and I am concerned for how this will impact her work, which is in an understudied branch of our field.
10. about damn time.

Date: 2022-03-29 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anna_wing
Deep Time has that effect too.

Any approach to sex work that does not prioritise helping women not to have to be sex workers is exploitive.
Edited Date: 2022-03-29 11:03 am (UTC)

Date: 2022-03-29 11:59 am (UTC)
bens_dad: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bens_dad
11. I'd love a 4K monitor or two, but 75" is far too big.
43" seems to be the smallest standard size, which would be far too close on my desk.
I see that Samsung do the 32" QN32Q50RAFXZA which is better, but still too big really.

(I have actually just moved from a 17" 1280x1024 to a 22" 1920x1200 and haven't yet attempted to have both on my desk.)

Date: 2022-03-29 02:21 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
I've been using a 40" 4K monitor on my desk at home for years, at normal desk viewing distance, and I really like it¹. It works out to 110 DPI, which is close enough to the 100 DPI of conventional non-high-res monitors that I can ignore the difference, and instead of treating it as an extra-high-res display for sharpness, treat it as an exceptionally large area of conventional-DPI work space. All the non-overlapping terminals and editor windows I can eat!

One of the best things about switching to working from home in the last couple of years has been the opportunity to use that monitor for my work as well as my out-of-hours activity. If and when I move back to the office, I'll find the monitors I last had there to be a great disappointment.
¹ I like the general concept, that is. There are a number of things I'd change about this particular monitor, unrelated to the display quality – it takes about 30s to restore from power-saving mode, and its audio has a long fade-in that makes me miss important beeps. I suspect both of these have to do with it being a hasty adaptation of a product originally intended as a TV.

Date: 2022-03-29 05:58 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Lol. I'm your polar opposite. I'm happiest on an 11-15" laptop screen, 22" monitors feel too big. I can only look at one thing at a time and the less eye or head movement the better :-).

Maybe because when I read a book (for example) I only focus on a page about 3-5 times down the centre. No doubt due to being longsighted my whole life and every focus has always been extra effort. I don't like to wear my now-necessary varifocals to code for that reason - focus area is too narrow, even for my special "office glasses" (ludicrously top of the range ultra custom Roderstock lenses).

Big or multiple screens never worked for me. I suppose for those with normal eyesight where focussing is less energetically expensive, they might be great!

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 05:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »