andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2012-01-27 01:49 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
Re the "covering up an epidemic": that's for values of "covering up" that mean "concluding, again, that this is a new name for a known psychological rather than basically dermatological disorder."

Date: 2012-01-28 07:28 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
The Mail website stats normally include all the AN sites, does that still include the Metro? I forget.

But also? Despite my dislike of the editorial content, it is probably the best designed, most accessible and most likely to get me reading elsewhere newspaper site I can recall ever going to. Whoever they hired to design that deserves a huge amount of credit.

And yeah, working on the minimum wage thing. And if it comes through that'll be two party policies directly inspired by a former UKIP press officer.

Date: 2012-01-27 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
"Of course, I'm still waiting for anything graphene related to make it into the shops."

Wasn't graphene first discovered from pencils? The graphite occasionally sheds graphene flakes as you write.

I think I may have found your product :)

Date: 2012-01-27 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com
> Annouce that the minimum wage, full time, full year, is to be the new personal allowance. One changes, both change.

Lovely, but without numbers I'm clueless as to what this actually entails. How much is min wage p.a.?

Date: 2012-01-27 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fyrie.livejournal.com
I was living on less than that for my first two years in Edinburgh. That was not a fun time.

Date: 2012-01-27 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fyrie.livejournal.com
Ahaha. No. That was my full time wage. I was an office monkey and didn't realise how much I was being shafted for the amount of work I was doing.

Date: 2012-01-27 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fyrie.livejournal.com
That was almost 4 years ago, though. Still, it was the lowest they could legally pay me at the time.

Date: 2012-01-27 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
You have been through this before. Plenty of people get paid below minimum wage, regrettably.

Date: 2012-01-27 12:49 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-01-27 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
It looks more likely that people who do overtime get depression rather than the other way around.

"Cars kill cities" chooses an annoying example. (Is there a term for that rhetorical trick?) Instead of mentioning important errands which involve moving a substantial amount of mass (buying food, taking babies and toddlers anywhere), the example repeatedly given is picking up dry cleaning.

In re the hidden epidemic-- damned if I know. Sometimes real problems (agent orange, fibromyalgia) get ignored.

I'm not a geek, but the programming video was still pretty funny, even if I probably missed some of the fine points.

Date: 2012-01-27 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
I would say that's true about food if you're not buying for more than two people, aren't generally buying beverages, and aren't buying from anywhere far enough away that you want to consolidate shopping trips.

Date: 2012-01-27 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laplor.livejournal.com
Agreed, and sadly, mine is badly designed in that very way.

My city deliberately uses a zoning system to ensure that residential, business, retail, and industrial areas all be as separate as possible. You cannot live near where you work, nor buy food near either your home nor your job.

Then they provide bus service between the zones only on the hour, and not before 7 am nor after malls close. They can't understand why the bus system is lightly used, so the keep withdrawing routes and runs.

Lately they've been on a kick to try to reduce car/pedestrian fatalities - a problem that better urban design would have greatly prevented!

Date: 2012-01-27 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
I've got varied grocery shopping within half a mile, but if I want Whole Foods or Trader Joe's (and I generally do), I use a bicycle with large baskets, and (especially the Trader Joe's) is far enough away that I don't want to bike there (mass transit would take about as long on the average, I think, and it would be less convenient to carry things) every couple of days.

Date: 2012-02-01 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
Most of the U.S. is badly designed in this way, due to commercial/residential zoning restrictions. You'll see miles of housing, then maybe some major roadways, then miles of shopping. Walking simply isn't an option. (In actual cities, or in "town centres" that are popping up here and there in the suburban areas, walking or biking can be more feasible.)

Date: 2012-01-27 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
I don't own a car; I buy food. Food buying does not required a car. Here are three ways I have handled food buying at various times in my life:
*buy small amounts often, say by stopping at the grocery store on the way home from work and getting dinner. Thus the amount bought fits easily onto a bike.
*order online, get food delivered. Yes, this uses a van, but one van delivering to ten people is less than ten cars.
*own a bike trailer. Now I can fit a whole LOT of shopping onto a bicycle.

I don't myself have a child but I know people who do and who get them places on foot (child in buggy/sling/etc), public transport, and bicycle (many ways of attaching children to bicycles exist).

I think that it is a failure of city planning if it is not generally possible for an able-bodied person who lives and works in the city in good health to walk all the places they regularly need to be (home, food shop, child's school, work, gym, wherever else you go) and a failure of public transport policy if it is not generally possible for anyone who is capable of moving around outside at all to move between those places. The prevelance of car-use where it is not strictly needed leads to cities being designed with car-use in mind, making them ever harder to use without a car.

Date: 2012-01-27 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com
I don't own a car; I buy food. Food buying does not required a car.

Yes, thank you!

Date: 2012-01-27 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
TBF if the nearest food shop to your house is 20 miles away, accessible only by a busy dual carriageway (on of the Tescos near Cambridge is essentially accessible only by using the A14 for instance) and no-one delivers food because "everyone has a car"... well, then it's a lot harder.

Also I assume that if you have a large family it is harder; but at the same time I would tend to assume that a large family contains more people who can go to the shop and carry things home from it.

(these days we are totes lazy and get that nice Mx Ocado to deliver our noms direct to our door; the main advantage of which is that I no longer buy a big bag of pasta when there are already two bags of pasta in the cupboard).

Date: 2012-01-27 06:42 pm (UTC)
ext_9215: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hfnuala.livejournal.com
I have 2 kids (2 and 5) and no car and I do all my shopping and kid wrangling on foot with buggy and occasional bus use. Of course, I live in a medium density inner suburb of Edinburgh - school is 10 minutes 2 year old walk away, 5 minutes when she's in the buggy, there are 5 supermarkets walking distance away and several more a direct bus from here. Also walking distance are a library, cinema, park, high school, city farm and a canal. This area was mostly built in late Victorian times.

I couldn't imagine my life if I lived in a modern new build car centred suburb but I suspect I would have been hospitalised by now.

Date: 2012-01-28 01:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
interesting.

people who drive tend to swear that things are very difficult without a car.
people who do not drive tend to point out that they manage those things perfectly well without a car.

I am of the latter camp.
as a career cyclist with one successfully raised child, I can assure you that those things can be done extremely easily without a car.

I'm also [as a student of both civil and mechanical engineering] horrified by the amount of space devoted to parking in the given example. Especially having designed car parks.

Date: 2012-01-27 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
re: Mail vs. Times... I would visit the NYT (or IHT, the international version) a lot more if they didn't cap ad-supported "free" access to a mere 20 articles a month. I ran out of "free" viewings last Friday, and won't get any more until next Tuesday... and I am certainly NOT subscribing for their "99¢ subscription" given that they are so cagey about what the subscription will cost after the promo expires. (And likely not even then, given how damned expensive they have been in the past given that you still see bloody ads.)

If the Mail is still free to access online, then there's one reason it surpassed the Times.

As for the "cover up", well, no; "Morgellon's Disease" has never been well supported by research literature, and certainly anyone other than the True Believers has found that the foreign matter samples were from textiles or other common environmental substances.

-- Steve is certainly not dismissing the syndrome, but thinks that "delusional parasitosis" is a better term. Now to find out why these folks' neural nets are falsely signalling the creepy-crawlies...

Date: 2012-01-27 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
Oh, I'm quite aware of the "Dail Fail"'s reputation... I'm guessing that the bulk of its traffic is celebrity gossip and surrepetitious photos of starlets in swimwear, with a side-order of fascist frothing. I was just pointing out that the NYT is at least in part the authour of its own woes.

-- Steve wishes he was part of The Conspiracy; his retirement fund could do with some top-up with Illumaniti money.

Date: 2012-01-27 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
"...it's that The Mail is an appalling newspaper. If The Guardian or somesuch had taken top spot I'd be perfectly happy."

As you'd imagine, I take the opposite view and would reverse the two newspapers in that statement!

Date: 2012-01-27 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Sorry. We'll just have to agree to disagree...

Date: 2012-01-27 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
While the stories the Guardian breaks are sometimes important in the sense of being about events affecting the world in a big way, a celebrity story broken in the Daily Mail, on TMZ or in the pages of Hello! may well be seen as more important by individual people.

I care more about the SNP's position on corporation tax than I do the love-life of Justin Bieber or who was a bitch backstage at the X-Factor, but the latter two examples are going to sell more papers/magazines and so be important to people. (although I, like you, would have a different view of what's important)

Date: 2012-01-27 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
The Daily Mail (the paper edition) really doesn't do much in the way of celebrity gossip - nowhere near as much as the website does. When it does, they are generally fluffy light-hearted articles rather than news stories.

Date: 2012-01-27 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
For a fairly topical one, how about the Stephen Lawrence thing?


It's a fairly important point made in that BBC website article that we're talking about the website, not the newspaper. The website does show some content from the newspaper, but an awful lot of the stories on the website don't appear in print. The print newspaper doesn't have much in the way of celebrity gossip for example.

Date: 2012-01-27 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI

"I know it's true; I read it in the Daily Mail" is sufficient rebuttal while being more entertaining than anything I could come up with off-the-cuff, so I'll just stick with that.

-- Steve is gradually becoming less amazed with the remarkable run of the Weekly World News, given how little its coverage differs from that of the Daily Mail.

Date: 2012-01-27 07:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
You got the depression thing backwards. Your link up above says that people with depression are more likely to do overtime, but the actual article says that doing overtime can lead to depression.

Unless you were awkwardly phrasing a sentence where you meant "People with depression are likely to have done overtime", perhaps?

I was going to go "wait, are you talking about me?" if it was linking depression as a cause of staying at work for long hours rather than vice versa :-D

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 11:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »